On Fri, 25 Jan 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> This patch was committed to trunk (r265940), but HJ's review comments
> were never addressed (and look correct to me):
> https://clicktime.symantec.com/3QJw9yc7Scra74WXzR3yBDR6H2?u=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu.org%2Fml%2Fgcc-patches%2F2016-07%2Fmsg00146.html
On 29/01/19 14:12 -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:07:31PM +, Romain GEISSLER wrote:
> Le 29 janv. 2019 à 20:03, Marek Polacek a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Indeed. Romain, are you going to submit a followup patch t
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:07:31PM +, Romain GEISSLER wrote:
> > Le 29 janv. 2019 à 20:03, Marek Polacek a écrit :
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > Indeed. Romain, are you going to submit a followup patch to address this?
> >
> > Marek
>
> H
> Le 29 janv. 2019 à 20:03, Marek Polacek a écrit :
>
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Indeed. Romain, are you going to submit a followup patch to address this?
>
> Marek
Hi,
I submitted the original patch because it was not written by me but by Davide,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 03:06:41PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 20/10/18 12:18 +0200, Romain Geissler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=ldd. A
> > patch implementing it was already submitted in
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-0
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 04:34:59PM -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:01:30PM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
> > LLVM currently ships with a new ELF linker http://lld.llvm.org/.
> > I experiment a lot with gcc and lld so it would be nice if
> > -fuse-ld=lld is supported (c
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:01:30PM -0700, Davide Italiano wrote:
> LLVM currently ships with a new ELF linker http://lld.llvm.org/.
> I experiment a lot with gcc and lld so it would be nice if
> -fuse-ld=lld is supported (considering the linker is now mature enough
> to link large C/C++ application
On 20/10/18 12:18 +0200, Romain Geissler wrote:
Hi,
I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=ldd. A
patch implementing it was already submitted in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01722.html by Davide
Italiano. This patch still applies correctly to current tru
On 10/20/18 4:18 AM, Romain Geissler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=ldd. A
> patch implementing it was already submitted in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01722.html by Davide
> Italiano. This patch still applies correctly to curre
On Thu, 8 Nov 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
The patch is OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
Thanks. Can you please apply it as I don't have any commit rights ?
The patch can be found in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg01240.html
Here is a valid gcc/ChangeLog correctly formated where I am ref
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 12:00 PM Romain Geissler
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 3:19 AM Romain Geissler
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=lld.
> > >
> >
> > LGTM. But I can't approve it.
> >
> > --
>
On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 3:19 AM Romain Geissler
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=lld.
> >
>
> LGTM. But I can't approve it.
>
> --
> H.J.
Hi,
Is there any gcc reviewer that could comment whether or not this sm
On Sat, Oct 20, 2018 at 3:19 AM Romain Geissler
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=ldd. A
> patch implementing it was already submitted in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01722.html by Davide
> Italiano. This patch still applies corre
Ping^2
> Le 27 oct. 2018 à 11:33, Romain GEISSLER a
> écrit :
>
> Ping
>
>> Le 20 oct. 2018 à 12:18, Romain Geissler a
>> écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=ldd. A
>> patch implementing it was already submitted in
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/
Ping
> Le 20 oct. 2018 à 12:18, Romain Geissler a
> écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to raise again the question of supporting -fuse-ld=ldd. A
> patch implementing it was already submitted in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg01722.html by Davide
> Italiano. This patch still appl
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:36:52PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2016.07.04 at 10:08 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
> > > wrote:
> > >> + HJ who wrote the code for the option or
On Jul 4, 2016, at 12:36 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>
> On 2016.07.04 at 10:08 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
>>> wrote:
+ HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
>
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 9:12 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
>> wrote:
>>> + HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Davide Italiano
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
wrote:
> On 2016.07.04 at 10:08 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
>> > wrote:
>> >> + HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
>>
On 2016.07.04 at 10:08 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
> > wrote:
> >> + HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Davide Italiano
> >> wrote:
>
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> LLVM currently ships with a new ELF linker http://lld.llvm.org/.
> I experiment a lot with gcc and lld so it would be nice if
> -fuse-ld=lld is supported (considering the linker is now mature enough
> to link large C/C++ applications).
>
>
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
> wrote:
>> + HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Davide Italiano
>> wrote:
>>> LLVM currently ships with a new ELF linker http://lld.ll
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano
> wrote:
>> + HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Davide Italiano
>> wrote:
>>> LLVM currently ships with a new ELF linker http://lld.ll
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> + HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Davide Italiano
> wrote:
>> LLVM currently ships with a new ELF linker http://lld.llvm.org/.
>> I experiment a lot with gcc and lld so it would be nic
+ HJ who wrote the code for the option originally.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Davide Italiano wrote:
> LLVM currently ships with a new ELF linker http://lld.llvm.org/.
> I experiment a lot with gcc and lld so it would be nice if
> -fuse-ld=lld is supported (considering the linker is now mat
25 matches
Mail list logo