Re: [COMMITTED] patch for PR95464

2020-06-04 Thread Vladimir Makarov via Gcc-patches
On 2020-06-04 12:55 p.m., H.J. Lu wrote: On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:17 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: The testcase from the PR was a dg-do run testcase that FAILed without your patch, can't we just use that testcase (in gcc.target/i386/, restricted to lp64 and possibly linux only to m

Re: [COMMITTED] patch for PR95464

2020-06-04 Thread H.J. Lu via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 9:17 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 12:13:51PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > The following patch fixes > > > >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464 > > > > The patch was successfully bootst

Re: [COMMITTED] patch for PR95464

2020-06-04 Thread Vladimir Makarov via Gcc-patches
On 2020-06-04 12:17 p.m., Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 12:13:51PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov via Gcc-patches wrote: The following patch fixes    https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464 The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86-64.  I did not

Re: [COMMITTED] patch for PR95464

2020-06-04 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 12:13:51PM -0400, Vladimir Makarov via Gcc-patches wrote: > The following patch fixes > >            https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95464 > > The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86-64.  I did not > test it on other major targets