On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 04:43:56PM +0100, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Heh. I just ran into this while debugging the problem reported by Xi.
>
> We are solving NAN = op1 - VARYING, and trying to do it with op1 = NAN
> + VARYING, which returns op1 = NAN (incorrectly).
>
> I suppose in the above case o
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 3:58 PM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:02:46AM +0100, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > We can implement the op[12]_range entries for plus and minus in terms
> > of each other. These are adapted from the integer versions.
>
> I think for NANs the op[12]_range s
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 10:02:46AM +0100, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> We can implement the op[12]_range entries for plus and minus in terms
> of each other. These are adapted from the integer versions.
I think for NANs the op[12]_range shouldn't act this way.
For the forward binary operations, we hav
