On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 04:51:53PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> * c-tree.h (C_ARRAY_PARM): New macro, alias for DECL_LANG_FLAG_2.
"New macro." would be enough.
> --- gcc/c/c-decl.c(revision 210004)
> +++ gcc/c/c-decl.c(working copy)
> @@ -4650,6 +4650,8 @@ push_parm_decl (const s
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> The following apply to all versions of this patch:
>
> * New options need documenting in invoke.texi.
Added.
>
> * New options need nonempty help text in c.opt. (It's unfortunate that
> the -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess option immediately abov
The following apply to all versions of this patch:
* New options need documenting in invoke.texi.
* New options need nonempty help text in c.opt. (It's unfortunate that
the -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess option immediately above got added without
such help text.)
* Don't use %s with IDENTIFIER_PO
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:13 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Apr 27, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Trevor Saun
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 27, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Trevor Saunders
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 06:21:20PM +0530,
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 27, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Trevor Saunders
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 06:21:20PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Trevo
> On Apr 27, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Trevor Saunders
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 06:21:20PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Trevor Saunders
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 06:21:20PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Trevor Saunders
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:31:46AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> Shall it a go
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 06:21:20PM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Trevor Saunders
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:31:46AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Shall it a good idea to add new warning -Wsizeof-array-argument that
> >> war
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:31:46AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Shall it a good idea to add new warning -Wsizeof-array-argument that
>> warns when sizeof is applied on parameter declared as an array ?
>
> Seems reasonable
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 02:31:46AM +0530, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> Shall it a good idea to add new warning -Wsizeof-array-argument that
> warns when sizeof is applied on parameter declared as an array ?
Seems reasonable enough.
> Similar to clang's -Wsizeof-array-argument:
> http://
13 matches
Mail list logo
