Re: [C++0x patch] constexpr in attribute argument

2011-03-15 Thread Jason Merrill
Applied on trunk. Jason

Re: [C++0x patch] constexpr in attribute argument

2011-03-11 Thread Rodrigo Rivas
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: > Sure, I guess calling it in one place is better.  But I think let's wait > until 4.6.1 for this patch. Oh, I didn't notice the only-regression-fixes status. No problem. -- Rodrigo.

Re: [C++0x patch] constexpr in attribute argument

2011-03-11 Thread Jason Merrill
On 03/11/2011 04:33 AM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote: On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: How about just calling maybe_constant_value call after the fold_non_dependent_expr call in cp_parser_parenthesized_expression_list? Well, I first tried something like this, but the key problem i

Re: [C++0x patch] constexpr in attribute argument

2011-03-11 Thread Rodrigo Rivas
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Jason Merrill wrote: > How about just calling maybe_constant_value call after the > fold_non_dependent_expr call in cp_parser_parenthesized_expression_list? Well, I first tried something like this, but the key problem is the *non_dependent* part, so it does nothin

Re: [C++0x patch] constexpr in attribute argument

2011-03-10 Thread Jason Merrill
How about just calling maybe_constant_value call after the fold_non_dependent_expr call in cp_parser_parenthesized_expression_list? Jason