On 05/14/2012 01:22 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
Is it ok for the 4.7 branch too?
Yes.
Jason
On May 10, 2012, Jason Merrill wrote:
> OK.
Thanks, installed a few days ago.
Is it ok for the 4.7 branch too? I didn't realize the bug could occur
there as well, but PR c++/53209 suggests it does. Regstrapping now.
--
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighterhttp://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must
OK.
Jason
Alexandre Oliva a écrit:
[...]
> Anyway, the problem is that, for some unsuitable candidate template
> specializations, tsubst returns error_mark_node, which tsubst_decl
> stores in argvec, and later on register_specialization gets this
> error_mark_node and tries to access it as a tree_vec.
>
>
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:17:23PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> I've recently started getting “libstdc++-v3/include/functional:2057:63:
>> internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_vec, have error_mark
>> in comp_template_
Hi,
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:17:23PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I've recently started getting “libstdc++-v3/include/functional:2057:63:
> internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree_vec, have error_mark
> in comp_template_args_with_info, at cp/pt.c:7038” on i686-linux-gnu,
> building
