On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:42 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Andy Gibbs wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please can I "bump" this patch and ask for it to be approved and
>> committed:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01711.html
>
> Have you sent in your copyright assignme
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Andy Gibbs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please can I "bump" this patch and ask for it to be approved and committed:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01711.html
Have you sent in your copyright assignment papers to the FSF? The patch
is large enough to need them.
--
Jose
On Friday, October 21, 2011 12:04 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> What's the motivation for this? Why can't it be implemented using C++
> features such as templates and specialization?
Sorry for the delay in my reply.
The motivation, simply put, is to be able to create both templates and
macros t
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Andy Gibbs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please can I "bump" this patch and ask for it to be approved and committed:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01711.html
>
> The patch is to implement the C built-in function __builtin_choose_expr(...)
> in C++.
>
> I'm afr
Andy Gibbs wrote on 18th October 2011 at 1:36 PM:
> Paolo Carlini wrote on 18th October 2011 at 12:00 PM:
>> I'm under the impression that some tests are written in C, wouldn't better
>> fit in c-c++-common?
>
> Ok, I can do this but I think only 2 out of the 8 tests can be moved
> across. I will
- Original Message -
From: "Paolo Carlini"
To: "Andy Gibbs"
Cc: ;
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] __builtin_choose_expr
> I'm under the impression that some tests are written in C, wouldn't better
> fit in c-
I'm under the impression that some tests are written in C, wouldn't
better fit in c-c++-common?
Thanks,
Paolo.
