On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11/25/2015 04:59 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>>>
>>> Index: cp/constexpr.c
>>> ===
>>> --- cp/constexpr.c (revision 230865)
>>> +++ cp/constexpr.c (workin
Both are OK.
Jason
Hi,
On 11/25/2015 04:59 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
Index: cp/constexpr.c
===
--- cp/constexpr.c (revision 230865)
+++ cp/constexpr.c (working copy)
@@ -1799,8 +1799,8 @@ cxx_eval_array_reference (const constexpr_ctx *c
On 2015.11.25 at 16:43 +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for this small 5/6 regression (an ICE) Markus suggests in the audit trail to
> protect the tree_to_shwi call with tree_fits_shwi_p. I tweaked a bit his
> suggestion adopting a pattern already used, eg, in the parser, and
> successfully t