subject:"Re\: \[C\+\+ Patch\] PR 56060"

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 56060

2013-10-06 Thread Paolo Carlini

Hi, Jason Merrill ha scritto: >For EXPR_PACK_EXPANSION we can just return true; a pack expansion is >always dependent, on the number of arguments if nothing else. Thanks. I suspected that ;) Then I'm going to test the corresponding very simple patch and commit it. Thanks again! Paolo

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 56060

2013-10-06 Thread Jason Merrill

For EXPR_PACK_EXPANSION we can just return true; a pack expansion is always dependent, on the number of arguments if nothing else. Jason