Re: [C++ Patch] PR 54485

2013-11-25 Thread Jason Merrill
On 11/25/2013 05:30 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: On 11/23/2013 10:08 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: I believe that our current practice is to have one error and then use inform for follow-on messages. OK with that change. Thanks. The multiple permerror and error aren't in the new code, my patch just shu

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 54485

2013-11-25 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 11/23/2013 10:08 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: I believe that our current practice is to have one error and then use inform for follow-on messages. OK with that change. Thanks. The multiple permerror and error aren't in the new code, my patch just shuffles those around. I would be glad to work on

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 54485

2013-11-23 Thread Jason Merrill
I believe that our current practice is to have one error and then use inform for follow-on messages. OK with that change. Jason