On 07/09/2013 05:09 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/08/2013 07:32 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ && (CLASS_TYPE_P (decl_specifiers.type)
+ || TREE_CODE (decl_specifiers.type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE))
You can use OVERLOAD_TYPE_P here if you want.
Ah, I seemed to remember we had something
On 07/08/2013 07:32 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
+ && (CLASS_TYPE_P (decl_specifiers.type)
+ || TREE_CODE (decl_specifiers.type) == ENUMERAL_TYPE))
You can use OVERLOAD_TYPE_P here if you want. OK either way.
Jason
On 07/08/2013 08:01 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/08/2013 01:49 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Ah I see. I take your indication as meaning class *or enum*
Yes.
Thanks. Thus, as agreed, I tested the below. Ok?
Paolo.
///
Index: cp/parser.c
==
On 07/08/2013 01:49 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Ah I see. I take your indication as meaning class *or enum*
Yes.
Jason
Hi,
>On 07/07/2013 12:32 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> -auto int; // { dg-error "multiple types|can only be specified for
>variables" }
>> +auto int; // { dg-error "multiple types|does not declare anything" }
>
>This is a regression. Please limit the change to when the type is a
>class.
Ah I see
On 07/07/2013 12:32 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
-auto int; // { dg-error "multiple types|can only be specified for variables" }
+auto int; // { dg-error "multiple types|does not declare anything" }
This is a regression. Please limit the change to when the type is a class.
Jason
