On 09/15/2017 11:07 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 09/14/2017 04:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
There is one 1z spot in gcc/doc/standards.texi, but that whole paragraph
looks wrong, can somebody please rewrite it to match the reality?
This patch addresses that paragraph. I've rewritten it using t
On 09/14/2017 04:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
There is one 1z spot in gcc/doc/standards.texi, but that whole paragraph
looks wrong, can somebody please rewrite it to match the reality?
This patch addresses that paragraph. I've rewritten it using the c++11
and C++14 examples and removed any re
On 09/14/2017 04:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
Given https://herbsutter.com/2017/09/06/c17-is-formally-approved/
this patch makes -std=c++17 and -std=gnu++17 the documented options
and -std=c++1z and -std=gnu++1z deprecated aliases, adjusts diagnostics etc.
Bootstrapped/regtest on x86_64-linu
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:32:12PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 09/14/2017 09:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > +@item c++17
> > +@itemx c++1z
> > +The 2017 ISO C++ standard plus amendments.
> > +The name @samp{c++1z} is deprecated.
> > +
> > +@item gnu++17
> > +@itemx gnu++1z
> > +GNU dialect of @
On 09/14/2017 09:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> +@item c++17
> +@itemx c++1z
> +The 2017 ISO C++ standard plus amendments.
> +The name @samp{c++1z} is deprecated.
> +
> +@item gnu++17
> +@itemx gnu++1z
> +GNU dialect of @option{-std=c++17}.
> +The name @samp{gnu++17} is deprecated.
> @end table
I
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 02:24:01PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> > --- gcc/doc/invoke.texi.jj 2017-09-12 21:57:57.0 +0200
> > +++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi 2017-09-14 19:32:34.342959968 +0200
> > @@ -1870,15 +1870,15 @@ GNU dialect of @option{-std=c++14}.
> > This is the default for C++ code.
>
On Sep 14, 2017, at 1:26 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Given https://herbsutter.com/2017/09/06/c17-is-formally-approved/
> this patch makes -std=c++17 and -std=gnu++17 the documented options
> --- gcc/doc/invoke.texi.jj2017-09-12 21:57:57.0 +0200
> +++ gcc/doc/invoke.texi 2017-0
