On 10/05/2017 05:25 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
On 10/04/2017 11:29 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
Hmm, I think the error is in the behavior, not the comment. :)
I wouldn't disagree.
F
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 10/04/2017 11:29 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
>>> In answering a question about passing non-trivial types through ..., I
>>> discovered a misleading comment. It is NOT just like a va
On 10/04/2017 11:29 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
In answering a question about passing non-trivial types through ..., I
discovered a misleading comment. It is NOT just like a value parm, because
we don't locally copy it.
Hmm, I think the err
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> In answering a question about passing non-trivial types through ..., I
> discovered a misleading comment. It is NOT just like a value parm, because
> we don't locally copy it.
Hmm, I think the error is in the behavior, not the comment. :)
