Re: [C++] PR53055

2012-10-12 Thread Marc Glisse
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Jason Merrill wrote: Let's use RO_ARROW_STAR to be more readable. I now realize that I have no idea what RO_ARROW_PM was supposed to stand for (Pointer to Member?), which proves that it was a bad name ;-) OK with that change. Thanks. -- Marc Glisse

Re: [C++] PR53055

2012-10-12 Thread Jason Merrill
Let's use RO_ARROW_STAR to be more readable. OK with that change. Jason