On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
And thanks for your explanations. With those, I am fine.
Thanks, I'll commit shortly.
Might it make sense to add some of the background you shared to the
documentation to describe the limitations?
I guess so. I'll mark it somewhere, but no promis
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Good luck, catching up always seems to take forever...
Thanks!
And thanks for your explanations. With those, I am fine. (Might it make
sense to add some of the background you shared to the documentation to
describe the limitations? "No" or "Yes, but I
On Sat, 25 Jan 2014, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
sorry for the delay. I "killed" my notebook on the first day of
vaction in December by means of a few drops of water, and am still
catching up from weeks without connectivity more or less.
Good luck, catching up always seems to take forever...
+In
Hi Mark,
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Gerald, are you ok with this version? Jason's approval is conditional
> to your opinion ;-)
sorry for the delay. I "killed" my notebook on the first day of
vaction in December by means of a few drops of water, and am still
catching up from week
Gerald, are you ok with this version? Jason's approval is conditional to
your opinion ;-)
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
Index: doc/extend.texi
=
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
Index: doc/extend.texi
===
+In C++, the ternary operator @code{?:} is available. @code{a?b:c}, where
+@code{b} and @code{c} are vectors of the same ty
The rest of the change is OK once you've clarified this.
Jason
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> Index: doc/extend.texi
>> ===
>> +In C++, the ternary operator @code{?:} is available. @code{a?b:c}, where
>> +@code{b} and @code{c} are vectors of the same type and @code{a} is an
>> +integer
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Only one comment from my side:
Index: doc/extend.texi
===
+In C++, the ternary operator @code{?:} is available. @code{a?b:c}, where
+@code{b} and @code{c} are vectors of the same type and @
Sorry, I was waiting for Jason to review (since he's the subject
matter expert), and I guess he was waiting for me?
Jason, can you please have a look and approve?
Only one comment from my side:
Index: doc/extend.texi
===
+In C++, th
10 matches
Mail list logo
