Hi!
On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 16:36:01 +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/05/2016 04:14 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > Thanks. I'm not able to formally approve these changes, but FWIW these
> > patches look good to me (assuming usual testing).
>
> LGTM too, so OK.
Without changes, committed to trunk i
On 10/05/2016 04:14 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
Thanks. I'm not able to formally approve these changes, but FWIW these
patches look good to me (assuming usual testing).
LGTM too, so OK.
Bernd
On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 14:34 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've now also run into this issue, during contrib/config-list.mk
> testing;
> log/arm-wrs-vxworks-make.out, log/i686-wrs-vxworks-make.out,
> log/i686-wrs-vxworksae-make.out, log/mips-wrs-vxworks-make.out,
> log/powerpc-wrs-vxworks
Hi!
I've now also run into this issue, during contrib/config-list.mk testing;
log/arm-wrs-vxworks-make.out, log/i686-wrs-vxworks-make.out,
log/i686-wrs-vxworksae-make.out, log/mips-wrs-vxworks-make.out,
log/powerpc-wrs-vxworks-make.out, log/powerpc-wrs-vxworksae-make.out,
log/powerpc-wrs-vxworksmi
On Thu, 2016-06-30 16:09:23 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 08:38 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> > > I haven't given it any additional manual testing so far. It's
> > > pre-installation though. Maybe I'd just set WIND_BASE to some
> > > arbitrary value, just to make xgcc pass i
On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 08:38 -0400, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> Jan-Benedict,
>
> > I haven't given it any additional manual testing so far. It's
> > pre-installation though. Maybe I'd just set WIND_BASE to some
> > arbitrary value, just to make xgcc pass it's initial start-up test
> > so
> > that it c
Jan-Benedict,
I haven't given it any additional manual testing so far. It's
pre-installation though. Maybe I'd just set WIND_BASE to some
arbitrary value, just to make xgcc pass it's initial start-up test so
that it can continue with self-testing? Or shall we set some value
in gcc/Makefile.in fo
