On 06/13/2016 10:46 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hmm, namespace conflict. I guess renaming enum items to REASON_* should
> solve it easily.
> Or we can add a namespace.
>
> Martin, both variants of fix are pre-approved.
> Honza
OK, I've just installed (r237370) a patch that prefixes all enum values
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Thu, 2016-06-09 13:24:10 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 06/08/2016 02:41 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > Adding hash for this prupose is bit of an overkill (there are
> > > definitly cheaper ways of solving so), but it will hardly affect compile
> > > time, so the pathc is OK.
On 06/12/2016 01:55 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> The new `NONE' from your enum clashes with a NONE used in a MSP430
> private enum.
>
> MfG, JBG
Hi.
Thanks for having heads up, I've been testing following patch. The patch
survives with --target=msp430-elf.
Ready after it finishes?
Thanks,
Mar
