On 06/21/11 18:24, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
revalidated with defaults to both gnu and gnu2 style. ok?
This is OK .
sigh, in backporting the relevant bits, I noticed a problem with the
OPTION_DEFAULT_SPECS string, fixed thusly, committed as obvious. And then I
noticed I'd failed to commi
> revalidated with defaults to both gnu and gnu2 style. ok?
This is OK .
Ramana
>
> nathan
> --
> Nathan Sidwell
>
>
This patches addresses your comments.
I've fixed:
* config and option items Joseph pointed out in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00719.html
* md items Ramana pointed out in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02109.html
* option naming and assembly issues Richard pointed
On 06/07/11 07:11, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 06/06/11 17:27, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> Eh? This is backwards. There is blx , but no bl . If the assembler
>> gets confused with 'bl r0' then it needs to be fixed urgently.
>
> Are you requiring the assembler be fixed before this patch can be com
On 06/06/11 17:27, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
Eh? This is backwards. There is blx , but no bl . If the assembler
gets confused with 'bl r0' then it needs to be fixed urgently.
Are you requiring the assembler be fixed before this patch can be committed
(without the '+'?)
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwe
On 05/10/11 07:49, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This patch implements TLS descriptor support in GCC. TLS descriptors
are described at
http://www.codesourcery.com/publications/RFC-TLSDESC-ARM.txt and
blessed by ARM, who have reserved the relocation numbers.
Binutils and GLIBC patches are already com
On 6 June 2011 10:56, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 06/06/11 10:53, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>>
>>> If you're asking something else, can you rephrase the question?
>>
>> Sorry if I wasn't too clear. My question really should have read "why
>> do we have to special case Thumb2" ? The linker shoul
On 06/06/11 10:53, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
If you're asking something else, can you rephrase the question?
Sorry if I wasn't too clear. My question really should have read "why
do we have to special case Thumb2" ? The linker should be able to
veneer the t-> a calls either through the vene
> If you're asking something else, can you rephrase the question?
Sorry if I wasn't too clear. My question really should have read "why
do we have to special case Thumb2" ? The linker should be able to
veneer the t-> a calls either through the veneering sequence (in case
of T1 without blx) or con
On 06/03/11 23:50, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
How are things handled for Thumb1 in case someone builds a routine for
Thumb1 which uses tlsdesc ? I went and read the doc and didn't see any
difference between T1 and T2 in the specification . Would the linker
and everyone else do the right thing o
On 31 May 2011 11:03, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> On 05/27/11 01:47, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>> Could you consider adding a check in the configury to test if a binutils
>> version
>> of recent vintage is being used when --with-tls=gnu is in ?
>
> I thought about that and it didn't seem worth it.
On 05/27/11 01:47, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
Could you consider adding a check in the configury to test if a binutils version
of recent vintage is being used when --with-tls=gnu is in ?
I thought about that and it didn't seem worth it. We're not autodetecting
whether to default to gnu-styl
Thanks for this and sorry about the length of time in reviewing this .
On 10/05/11 07:49, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This patch implements TLS descriptor support in GCC. TLS descriptors are
described at
http://www.codesourcery.com/publications/RFC-TLSDESC-ARM.txt and blessed
by ARM, who have reserved
On 05/10/11 07:49, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
This patch implements TLS descriptor support in GCC. TLS descriptors are
described at http://www.codesourcery.com/publications/RFC-TLSDESC-ARM.txt and
blessed by ARM, who have reserved the relocation numbers.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg
On 05/10/11 12:36, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
thanks for the review. I've addressed these issues, but will wait for
arm-specific review before reposting (I presume you want the chance to check the
non-mechanical opt-machinery changes)
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
On Tue, 10 May 2011, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> +@item -mtls-dialect=@var{dialect}
> +@opindex mtls-dialect
> +Specify the dialect to use for accessing thread local storage. Two
> +dialects are supported - @option{arm} and @option{gnu}. The
Use "---" (em dash, unspaced) instead of " - ".
> +@opti
16 matches
Mail list logo