On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 05:34:56PM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have addressed the issues you raised below.
>
> Is the amended patch OK for trunk?
Yes, thanks.
Committed as revision 252387.
Cheers,
James
Hi,
I have addressed the issues you raised below.
Is the amended patch OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Jackson.
On 09/12/2017 05:28 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:02:52AM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
I've attached a new patch that addresses some of the issues raised
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 10:02:52AM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've attached a new patch that addresses some of the issues raised with
> my original patch.
>
> On 08/23/2017 03:35 PM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> > Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry for only noticing now, but t
Hi all,
I've attached a new patch that addresses some of the issues raised with
my original patch.
On 08/23/2017 03:35 PM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Richard Sandiford wrote:
Sorry for only noticing now, but the call to aarch64_legitimate_address_p
is asking whether the MEM itself is a legitimat
Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
> Sorry for only noticing now, but the call to aarch64_legitimate_address_p
> is asking whether the MEM itself is a legitimate LDP/STP address. Also,
> it might be better to pass false for strict_p, since this can be called
> before RA. So maybe:
>
>if (GET_CODE (op
Jackson Woodruff writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
> b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
> index
> 74de9b8c89dd5e4e3d87504594c969de0e0128ce..ce1b981fc005edf48a401a456def2a37cf9d9022
> 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-simd.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-s
On 16/08/17 16:19, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I have changed the condition as you suggest below. OK for trunk?
>
> Jackson.
>
I renamed the testcase to vect_str_zero.c, as that seems to more closely
match the naming style, and checked this in.
Thanks for the patch.
R.
> On 08/
Hi Richard,
I have changed the condition as you suggest below. OK for trunk?
Jackson.
On 08/11/2017 02:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 10/08/17 14:12, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch changes patterns in aarch64-simd.md to replace
moviv0.4s, 0
strq0, [
On 10/08/17 14:12, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch changes patterns in aarch64-simd.md to replace
>
> moviv0.4s, 0
> strq0, [x0, 16]
>
> With:
>
> stp xzr, xzr, [x0, 16]
>
> When we are storing zeros to vectors like this:
>
> void f(uint32x4_t *p) {
>
