Re: [AARCH64][PATCH 2/3] Implementing vmulx_lane NEON intrinsic variants

2015-11-22 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:03:28AM +, Bilyan Borisov wrote: > > > On 03/11/15 11:16, James Greenhalgh wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:31:08AM +, Bilyan Borisov wrote: > >>In this patch from the series, all vmulx_lane variants have been > >>implemented as > >>a vdup followed by a vmu

Re: [AARCH64][PATCH 2/3] Implementing vmulx_lane NEON intrinsic variants + Changelog

2015-11-09 Thread Bilyan Borisov
On 09/11/15 11:03, Bilyan Borisov wrote: On 03/11/15 11:16, James Greenhalgh wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:31:08AM +, Bilyan Borisov wrote: In this patch from the series, all vmulx_lane variants have been implemented as a vdup followed by a vmulx. Existing implementations of intrinsi

Re: [AARCH64][PATCH 2/3] Implementing vmulx_lane NEON intrinsic variants

2015-11-09 Thread Bilyan Borisov
On 03/11/15 11:16, James Greenhalgh wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:31:08AM +, Bilyan Borisov wrote: In this patch from the series, all vmulx_lane variants have been implemented as a vdup followed by a vmulx. Existing implementations of intrinsics were refactored to use this new approach

Re: [AARCH64][PATCH 2/3] Implementing vmulx_lane NEON intrinsic variants

2015-11-03 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:31:08AM +, Bilyan Borisov wrote: > In this patch from the series, all vmulx_lane variants have been implemented > as > a vdup followed by a vmulx. Existing implementations of intrinsics were > refactored to use this new approach. > > Several new nameless md patterns