On 11 January 2016 at 10:46, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> However, the test doesn't really look at whether we're using glibc vs
> musl/bionic/uclibc, only at whether we are targeting -linux-gnu or
> -none-elf.
Fair point, the test case is not aligned with the implementation.
Rather than hang the test
On 11/01/16 08:12, Bilyan Borisov wrote:
+ /* Since fesetround () is not present in newlib, but it's present in glibc,
we
+ only define the __ARM_FP_FENV_ROUNDING macro to 1 when glibc is used
+ i.e. on aarch64-none-linux-gnu. The OPTION_GLIBC macro is undefined on
+ aarch64-none-e
On 11/01/16 10:28, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 11 January 2016 at 08:12, Bilyan Borisov wrote:
2015-XX-XX Bilyan Borisov
* config/aarch64/aarch64-c.c (aarch64_update_cpp_builtins): New
macro
definition.
gcc/testsuite/
2015-XX-XX Bilyan Borisov
* gcc.target/a
On 11 January 2016 at 08:12, Bilyan Borisov wrote:
> 2015-XX-XX Bilyan Borisov
>
> * config/aarch64/aarch64-c.c (aarch64_update_cpp_builtins): New
> macro
> definition.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> 2015-XX-XX Bilyan Borisov
>
> * gcc.target/aarch64/fesetround-checking-bare
