Jeff Law writes:
> On 07/13/2017 03:02 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> This patch treats the mode associated with an integer constant as a
>> scalar_mode. We can't use the more natural-sounding scalar_int_mode
>> because we also use (const_int 0) for bounds-checking modes. (It might
>> be worth
On 07/13/2017 03:02 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> This patch treats the mode associated with an integer constant as a
> scalar_mode. We can't use the more natural-sounding scalar_int_mode
> because we also use (const_int 0) for bounds-checking modes. (It might
> be worth adding a bounds-specific
