On Oct 21, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> I can remove the -w and fix C89/C11 incompatibilities, if anyone
> thinks it's worth it.
I’d leave the -w, no point in spending much time worrying about it. The -w is
so that no one has to spend time worrying about it. If you want to fix
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:48:55PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:32:31PM +, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 10/21/14 14:26, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > >This tweaks a few tests so that we don't have to skip them. This is
> > >mostly concerned with declaring main properly, or cha
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 03:32:31PM +, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/21/14 14:26, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> >This tweaks a few tests so that we don't have to skip them. This is
> >mostly concerned with declaring main properly, or changing other
> >declarations where the test does not seem to rely on the
On 10/21/14 14:26, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
This tweaks a few tests so that we don't have to skip them. This is
mostly concerned with declaring main properly, or changing other
declarations where the test does not seem to rely on the type mismatches.
I've also included one example of changing a fun
