On 07/06/11 20:37, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 10:42 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> get_mode_bounds should also use GET_MODE_PRECISION, but this exposes a
>> problem on ia64 - BImode needs to be handled specially here to work
>> around another preexisting special case in gen_int_mode.
>
On 07/06/2011 04:04 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> That might require target specific changes if there are assumptions that
> a BImode value is either 0 or 1, not 0 or -1. For now I'd prefer to
> minimize the impact.
Systems that set STORE_FLAG_VALUE to -1:
m68k
spu
Systems that use B
On 07/06/11 20:37, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 10:42 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> get_mode_bounds should also use GET_MODE_PRECISION, but this exposes a
>> problem on ia64 - BImode needs to be handled specially here to work
>> around another preexisting special case in gen_int_mode.
>
On 07/01/2011 10:42 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> get_mode_bounds should also use GET_MODE_PRECISION, but this exposes a
> problem on ia64 - BImode needs to be handled specially here to work
> around another preexisting special case in gen_int_mode.
Would it be better to remove the trunc_int_for_mode
