On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> On 15.03.2016 20:44, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > This test fails for me due to
> > > cc1plus: warning: var-tracking-assignments changes selective scheduling
> >
> > Thanks for the heads-up Marek, and s
On 15.03.2016 20:44, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Marek Polacek wrote:
This test fails for me due to
cc1plus: warning: var-tracking-assignments changes selective scheduling
Thanks for the heads-up Marek, and sorry for the trouble. Like I said in the
adjacent reply, the warnin
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Marek Polacek wrote:
> This test fails for me due to
> cc1plus: warning: var-tracking-assignments changes selective scheduling
Thanks for the heads-up Marek, and sorry for the trouble. Like I said in the
adjacent reply, the warning is expected (I didn't realize the testsuite
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:31:24PM +0300, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here we're looping because we decrease the counter of the insns we still can
> issue on a DEBUG_INSN thus rendering the counter negative. The fix is to
> not count debug insns in the corresponding code. The selectiv
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> Here we're looping because we decrease the counter of the insns we still can
> issue on a DEBUG_INSN thus rendering the counter negative. The fix is to not
> count debug insns in the corresponding code. The selective scheduling is
> known to spoil
