Hello,
On 14.03.2016 19:45, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 03/14/2016 05:23 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
In this case, we get an inconsistency between the sched-deps interface,
saying
we can't move an insn writing the si register through a vector insn, a
On 03/14/2016 05:23 PM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
In this case, we get an inconsistency between the sched-deps interface, saying
we can't move an insn writing the si register through a vector insn, and the
liveness analysis, saying we can. The latte
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
> In this case, we get an inconsistency between the sched-deps interface, saying
> we can't move an insn writing the si register through a vector insn, and the
> liveness analysis, saying we can. The latter doesn't take into account
> implicit_reg_pen
