On 4/14/25 10:22 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On Apr 14, 2025, Jeff Law wrote:
No strong opinion. I'd lean towards xfail or twiddling the test since
that's obviously super-save WRT codegen on the gcc-14 release branch.
Twiddling it is, then (pending approval ;-)
The pr118182-2.c testcase
OK for GCC 14 branch, thanks :)
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 12:23 PM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Apr 14, 2025, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> > No strong opinion. I'd lean towards xfail or twiddling the test since
> > that's obviously super-save WRT codegen on the gcc-14 release branch.
>
> Twiddling it is,
On Apr 14, 2025, Jeff Law wrote:
> No strong opinion. I'd lean towards xfail or twiddling the test since
> that's obviously super-save WRT codegen on the gcc-14 release branch.
Twiddling it is, then (pending approval ;-)
The pr118182-2.c testcase backported from gcc-15 depended on the late
com
