Hi Gerald:
Thanks for notifying me, we'll update that page soon :)
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 4:08 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Kito Cheng wrote:
> > - New option -misa-spec support: -misa-spec=[2.2|20190608|20191213] and
> >corresponding configuration option --with-isa-sp
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020, Kito Cheng wrote:
> - New option -misa-spec support: -misa-spec=[2.2|20190608|20191213] and
>corresponding configuration option --with-isa-spec.
I noticed https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/changes.html is currently empty.
Are you planning to add updates for the GCC 11 release?
Patch set committed :)
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 1:43 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
> >> Current GCC implementation is RISC-V ISA 2.2, this patch set implement
> v20190608 and v20191213, and also add option
> -misa-spec=[2.2|20190608|20191213] to change the default ISA spec version.
> >>
> >> There is one
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 5:29 AM Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:28 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
>>
>> +#ifndef HAVE_AS_MARCH_ZIFENCE
>> + /* Skip since older binutils don't recognize zifencei,
>> + we mad a mistake that is binutils 2.35 support zicsr but not support
>> + zifence
>> Current GCC implementation is RISC-V ISA 2.2, this patch set implement
>> v20190608 and v20191213, and also add option
>> -misa-spec=[2.2|20190608|20191213] to change the default ISA spec version.
>>
>> There is one major incompatible
>>
>> That option will effect the default version of each s
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:27 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
> Current GCC implementation is RISC-V ISA 2.2, this patch set implement
> v20190608 and v20191213, and also add option
> -misa-spec=[2.2|20190608|20191213] to change the default ISA spec version.
>
> There is one major incompatible
>
> That opti
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 11:28 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
> +#ifndef HAVE_AS_MARCH_ZIFENCE
> + /* Skip since older binutils don't recognize zifencei,
> + we mad a mistake that is binutils 2.35 support zicsr but not support
> + zifencei. */
> + skip_zifencei = true;
> +#endif
>
I'd suggest so
Oh I was dry-run but cc to gcc patches accidentally, but the patch set
is right, it just sent twice the same patch set.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:29 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
>
> - New option -misa-spec support: -misa-spec=[2.2|20190608|20191213] and
>corresponding configuration option --with-i
- New option -misa-spec support: -misa-spec=[2.2|20190608|20191213] and
corresponding configuration option --with-isa-spec.
- Current default ISA spec set to 2.2, but we intend to bump this to
20191213 or later in next release.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.c
Current GCC implementation is RISC-V ISA 2.2, this patch set implement
v20190608 and v20191213, and also add option -misa-spec=[2.2|20190608|20191213]
to change the default ISA spec version.
There is one major incompatible
That option will effect the default version of each sub-extension, for e
- New option -misa-spec support: -misa-spec=[2.2|20190608|20191213] and
corresponding configuration option --with-isa-spec.
- Current default ISA spec set to 2.2, but we intend to bump this to
20191213 or later in next release.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* common/config/riscv/riscv-common.c
Current GCC implementation is RISC-V ISA 2.2, this patch set implement
v20190608 and v20191213, and also add option -misa-spec=[2.2|20190608|20191213]
to change the default ISA spec version.
There is one major incompatible
That option will effect the default version of each sub-extension, for e
12 matches
Mail list logo
