> On Nov 9, 2023, at 11:50 AM, Jose Marchesi wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 03:49:49PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>> Is it reasonable to add one option to disable the “counted_by” attribute?
>>> (then no insertion of the new .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE into IL).
>>>
>>> The major reason is: som
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 03:49:49PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
>> Is it reasonable to add one option to disable the “counted_by” attribute?
>> (then no insertion of the new .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE into IL).
>>
>> The major reason is: some users might want to ignore all the “counted_by”
>> attribute a
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 03:49:49PM +, Qing Zhao wrote:
> Is it reasonable to add one option to disable the “counted_by” attribute?
> (then no insertion of the new .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE into IL).
>
> The major reason is: some users might want to ignore all the “counted_by”
> attribute added in t
Is it reasonable to add one option to disable the “counted_by” attribute?
(then no insertion of the new .ACCESS_WITH_SIZE into IL).
The major reason is: some users might want to ignore all the “counted_by”
attribute added in the source code,
We need to provide them a way to disable this feature
Hi,
Attached is the 2nd version of the proposal based on all the discussion so far.
Let me know if you have more comment and suggestion.
Thanks a lot for all the help.
Qing
===
Represent the missing dependence for the "counted_by" attribute and its
consu
