On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 05:36 AM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:26:46AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>>
>>> I decided to name the new file gimple-expr.[ch] instead of
>>> gimple-decl This will eventually split into
On 11/07/2013 05:36 AM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:26:46AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I decided to name the new file gimple-expr.[ch] instead of
gimple-decl This will eventually split into gimple-type.[ch],
gimple-decl.[ch], and gimple-expr.[ch].
Since we ar
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:26:46AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> I decided to name the new file gimple-expr.[ch] instead of
> gimple-decl This will eventually split into gimple-type.[ch],
> gimple-decl.[ch], and gimple-expr.[ch].
Since we are adding *new* C++ files, can't we please na
On 11/05/13 09:26, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 10/30/2013 11:18 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
As a result, any gimple queries regarding types, decls, or expressions
are actually tree queries. They are sprinkled throughout gimple.[ch] and
gimplify.[ch], not to mention tree.[ch] as well as other parts
On 10/30/13 21:18, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
Hopefully the other attempts to send this aren't queued up... in any
case, maybe I can't even attach a .dot file?... So no attachments this
time...
instead, the diagram is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/rearch?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=gimple.png
Hopefully the other attempts to send this aren't queued up... in any
case, maybe I can't even attach a .dot file?... So no attachments this
time...
instead, the diagram is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/rearch?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=gimple.png
