On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:42:47AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> I originally thought of using namespaces to fend off pass-specific globals,
> but eventually moving it all to a pass specific class would work, too.
>
> Note that there are some passes that have global data that is allocated
> and i
On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 10:42 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Thanks for looking at this; comments inline throughout.
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > I'm working on my first gcc contribution, but it's a large patch, and I
> > wanted to sound things out on this list.
> >
> >
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> I'm working on my first gcc contribution, but it's a large patch, and I
> wanted to sound things out on this list.
>
> I want to eliminate/minimize global state within gcc, since I think
> doing so is a key part of making gcc more modular.
>
>
I'm working on my first gcc contribution, but it's a large patch, and I
wanted to sound things out on this list.
I want to eliminate/minimize global state within gcc, since I think
doing so is a key part of making gcc more modular.
Currently there's a lot of global state associated with passes:
*
