On December 5, 2015 11:57:27 PM GMT+01:00, Gary Funck wrote:
>On 12/02/15 10:40:50, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
>> > The main change recommended to reduce tree space was moving the
>> > "layout factor" (blocking factor) out of the tree node, and using
>> > only t
On 12/02/15 10:40:50, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
> > The main change recommended to reduce tree space was moving the
> > "layout factor" (blocking factor) out of the tree node, and using
> > only two bits there, one bit for a relatively common case of 0,
> > and t
On 12/01/15 12:19:48, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 12/01/2015 06:31 AM, Gary Funck wrote:
> >At this time, we would like to re-submit the UPC patches for comment
> >with the goal of introducing these changes into GCC 6.0.
>
> This has missed stage 1 by a few weeks, we'd have to make an exception to
>
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
> On 12/01/15 12:12:29, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
> > > At this time, we would like to re-submit the UPC patches for comment
> > > with the goal of introducing these changes into GCC 6.0.
> >
> > First of all let me say
On 12/01/15 12:12:29, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
> > At this time, we would like to re-submit the UPC patches for comment
> > with the goal of introducing these changes into GCC 6.0.
>
> First of all let me say that it is IMNSHO now too late for GCC 6.
I realiz
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Bernd Schmidt writes:
>
> > I'm worried we'll end up carrying
> > something around as a burden that is of no practical use (considering
> > we already support the more widespread OpenMP).
>
> I'm not an expert on UPC, but from glancing over the descriptio
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> I'm worried we'll end up carrying
> something around as a burden that is of no practical use (considering
> we already support the more widespread OpenMP).
I'm not an expert on UPC, but from glancing over the description it
seems to target a distributed message passing pr
On 12/01/2015 04:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
Some time ago, we submitted an RFC for the introduction of
UPC support into GCC. During the intervening time period,
we have continued to keep the 'gupc' (GNU UPC) branch in sync
with the GCC trunk and have i
On 12/01/2015 06:31 AM, Gary Funck wrote:
At this time, we would like to re-submit the UPC patches for comment
with the goal of introducing these changes into GCC 6.0.
This has missed stage 1 by a few weeks, we'd have to make an exception
to include it at this late stage.
@@ -857,9 +875,14
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Gary Funck wrote:
>
> Some time ago, we submitted an RFC for the introduction of
> UPC support into GCC. During the intervening time period,
> we have continued to keep the 'gupc' (GNU UPC) branch in sync
> with the GCC trunk and have incorporated feedback and contributions
Some time ago, we submitted an RFC for the introduction of
UPC support into GCC. During the intervening time period,
we have continued to keep the 'gupc' (GNU UPC) branch in sync
with the GCC trunk and have incorporated feedback and contributions from
various GCC developers (Joseph Myers, Tom Tro
11 matches
Mail list logo
