Re: RFC/A: PR 58079: CONST_INT mode assert in combine.c:do_SUBST

2013-10-29 Thread Uros Bizjak
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> PR 58079 is about the do_SUBST assert: >> >> /* Sanity check that we're replacing oldval with a CONST_INT >> that is a valid sign-extension for the original mode. */ >> gcc_assert (INTVAL (newval) >> == trunc_int_for_mode (INTVA

Re: RFC/A: PR 58079: CONST_INT mode assert in combine.c:do_SUBST

2013-10-28 Thread Uros Bizjak
Hello! > PR 58079 is about the do_SUBST assert: > > /* Sanity check that we're replacing oldval with a CONST_INT > that is a valid sign-extension for the original mode. */ > gcc_assert (INTVAL (newval) > == trunc_int_for_mode (INTVAL (newval), GET_MODE (oldval))); > > triggering whil

Aw: RFC/A: PR 58079: CONST_INT mode assert in combine.c:do_SUBST

2013-08-07 Thread Jürgen Urban
> PR 58079 is about the do_SUBST assert: > > /* Sanity check that we're replacing oldval with a CONST_INT >that is a valid sign-extension for the original mode. */ > gcc_assert (INTVAL (newval) > == trunc_int_for_mode (INTVAL (newval), GET_MODE (oldval))); > >

Re: RFC/A: PR 58079: CONST_INT mode assert in combine.c:do_SUBST

2013-08-07 Thread Richard Biener
Richard Sandiford wrote: >PR 58079 is about the do_SUBST assert: > > /* Sanity check that we're replacing oldval with a CONST_INT >that is a valid sign-extension for the original mode. */ > gcc_assert (INTVAL (newval) > == trunc_int_for_mode (INTVAL (newval), GET

RFC/A: PR 58079: CONST_INT mode assert in combine.c:do_SUBST

2013-08-06 Thread Richard Sandiford
PR 58079 is about the do_SUBST assert: /* Sanity check that we're replacing oldval with a CONST_INT that is a valid sign-extension for the original mode. */ gcc_assert (INTVAL (newval) == trunc_int_for_mode (INTVAL (newval), GET_MODE (oldval))); triggering