On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 05:33:17PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Like so?
LGTM, thanks.
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-inline.c b/gcc/tree-inline.c
> index de5e575..6899d2a 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-inline.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-inline.c
> @@ -1045,6 +1045,7 @@ copy_tree_body_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees,
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:45:08AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> Is the tree-inline.c patch OK for trunk?
>
>> --- a/gcc/tree-inline.c
>> +++ b/gcc/tree-inline.c
>> @@ -1241,6 +1241,28 @@ copy_tree_body_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:45:08AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Is the tree-inline.c patch OK for trunk?
> --- a/gcc/tree-inline.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-inline.c
> @@ -1241,6 +1241,28 @@ copy_tree_body_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void
> *data)
> *walk_subtrees = 0;
> return NULL;
wg21.link/p0136 significantly changes the specification of C++11
inheriting constructors so that they become an implementation detail
rather than a language-level construct; instead, overload resolution
and such are done on the constructor from the base, and the artificial
constructor in the derive
