On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Richard Biener writes:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Sat, Apr
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
Richard Biener writes:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> wide-int
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> Richard Biener writes:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> wide-int fails to build libitm because of a
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
wide-int fails to build libitm because of a bad interaction between:
/* Keep the OI and XI modes from
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Richard Sandiford
>> wrote:
>>> wide-int fails to build libitm because of a bad interaction between:
>>>
>>> /* Keep the OI and XI modes from confusing the compiler into thinki
Richard Biener writes:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>> wide-int fails to build libitm because of a bad interaction between:
>>
>> /* Keep the OI and XI modes from confusing the compiler into thinking
>>that these modes could actually be used for computation.
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
> wide-int fails to build libitm because of a bad interaction between:
>
> /* Keep the OI and XI modes from confusing the compiler into thinking
>that these modes could actually be used for computation. They are
>only holders for v
Richard Sandiford writes:
> wide-int fails to build libitm because of a bad interaction between:
>
> /* Keep the OI and XI modes from confusing the compiler into thinking
>that these modes could actually be used for computation. They are
>only holders for vectors during data movement. */
wide-int fails to build libitm because of a bad interaction between:
/* Keep the OI and XI modes from confusing the compiler into thinking
that these modes could actually be used for computation. They are
only holders for vectors during data movement. */
#define MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT (1