(Sorry for my very brief reply the other day, I was on my phone and so
using gmail is a pain.)
On 16 December 2013 04:22, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
>> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:20:48 +0100
>
>> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -DSAMPLES=3" { target { { arm*-* } &&
>
On 12/16/13 04:22, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:20:48 +0100
+// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -DSAMPLES=3" { target { { arm*-* }&&
simulator } } }
+// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -DSAMPLES=1" { target simulator } }
JFTR, I managed to have
> From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:20:48 +0100
> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -DSAMPLES=3" { target { { arm*-* } &&
> simulator } } }
> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -DSAMPLES=1" { target simulator } }
JFTR, I managed to have two bugs here:
1 - the target tuple (u
> From: Jonathan Wakely
> Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 11:38:43 +0100
> On Dec 15, 2013 6:57 AM, "Hans-Peter Nilsson"
> wrote:
> >
> > From the revision range 205803:205810 (excluding:including) an
> > on, my autotester for cris-elf reports a regression:
> >
> > Running
> > /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/l
On Dec 15, 2013 6:57 AM, "Hans-Peter Nilsson"
wrote:
>
> From the revision range 205803:205810 (excluding:including) an
> on, my autotester for cris-elf reports a regression:
>
> Running
> /tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp
> ...
> WARNING: program timed
>From the revision range 205803:205810 (excluding:including) an
on, my autotester for cris-elf reports a regression:
Running
/tmp/hpautotest-gcc1/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ...
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: 20_util/hash/chi2_quality.cc execution test
This appears
