Re: RFA: patch to fix PR69299

2016-01-29 Thread Richard Henderson
On 01/28/2016 09:07 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: On 01/28/2016 08:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:01:23PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The following patch fixes PR69299. The details of the problem is described on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69299

Re: RFA: patch to fix PR69299

2016-01-28 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 01/28/2016 08:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:01:23PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The following patch fixes PR69299. The details of the problem is described on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69299 The patch was successfully bootstrapped and

Re: RFA: patch to fix PR69299

2016-01-28 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:01:23PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > The following patch fixes PR69299. > > The details of the problem is described on > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69299 > > The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64. > > The patc

RFA: patch to fix PR69299

2016-01-27 Thread Vladimir Makarov
The following patch fixes PR69299. The details of the problem is described on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69299 The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64. The patch introduces a new type of constraints define_special_memory_constraint for memory