Re: RFA: patch to fix PR58967

2013-11-04 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 11/04/2013 02:26 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: >> The following patch fixes >> >>http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58967 >> >> The removed code is too old. To be honest, I even don't remember why I >> added this. LRA has been

Re: RFA: patch to fix PR58967

2013-11-04 Thread Robert Dewar
On 11/4/2013 2:23 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: The following patch fixes http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58967 The removed code is too old. To be honest, I even don't remember why I added this. LRA has been changed a lot since this change and now it works fine without it. Whe

Re: RFA: patch to fix PR58967

2013-11-04 Thread David Edelsohn
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > The following patch fixes > >http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58967 > > The removed code is too old. To be honest, I even don't remember why I > added this. LRA has been changed a lot since this change and now it > works fi

RFA: patch to fix PR58967

2013-11-04 Thread Vladimir Makarov
The following patch fixes http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58967 The removed code is too old. To be honest, I even don't remember why I added this. LRA has been changed a lot since this change and now it works fine without it. There is no test for this case as it is too big. The