On 05/25/2011 04:26 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Thanks for reporting this. It was a very sensitive change therefore I
checked so many targets (about 10) but apparently not all of them. I'll
look at the CRIS problem tomorrow.
This broke SPARC (in default mode) as well:
eric@atlantis:~/build/gcc/s
> Thanks for reporting this. It was a very sensitive change therefore I
> checked so many targets (about 10) but apparently not all of them. I'll
> look at the CRIS problem tomorrow.
This broke SPARC (in default mode) as well:
eric@atlantis:~/build/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9> cat t.c
int main (vo
On 11-05-24 8:24 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
The following patch solves the problem described on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48971
The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86-64 and checked for ppc64, ia64,
i686-linux, i686-apple
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> The following patch solves the problem described on
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48971
>
> The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86-64 and checked for ppc64, ia64,
> i686-linux, i686-apple-darwin, mips, arm, s390x, and sparc with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/13/11 10:58, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> The following patch solves the problem described on
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48971
>
> The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86-64 and checked for ppc64,
> ia64, i686-linux, i686-
The following patch solves the problem described on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48971
The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86-64 and checked for ppc64,
ia64, i686-linux, i686-apple-darwin, mips, arm, s390x, and sparc with
and without -msoft-float.
Is it ok to submit to
