On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> The following patch fixes
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398
>>
>> Uros, there is i386.md part for which I need an approval. Without this
>> change, GCC will still generate the same code even if LRA uses an
>> alternative
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> The following patch fixes
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398
>
> Uros, there is i386.md part for which I need an approval. Without this
> change, GCC will still generate the same code even if LRA uses an
> alternative w
The following patch fixes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398
Uros, there is i386.md part for which I need an approval. Without this
change, GCC will still generate the same code even if LRA uses an
alternative with 'm' constraint.
2012-11-18 Vladimir Makarov
PR ta