Re: RFA: patch for test PR70669 test

2018-11-23 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 11/22/2018 07:30 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: Hi! On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:47:10PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote:  To generate the expected code with r in a general reg, I just decrease the number of getting r value into vsx reg by changing r + r onto -r. Is the following patch ok f

Re: RFA: patch for test PR70669 test

2018-11-22 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Hi! On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 02:47:10PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote: >   Today I committed a patch > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01945.html > >   But it makes gcc.target/powerpc/pr70669.c to fail.  Here is the patch > to fix the failure.  The expected code assumes that vari

RFA: patch for test PR70669 test

2018-11-22 Thread Vladimir Makarov
  Today I committed a patch https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg01945.html   But it makes gcc.target/powerpc/pr70669.c to fail.  Here is the patch to fix the failure.  The expected code assumes that variable r should get a general reg.  I suspect the expectation is wrong. There are t