Re: RFA: one more version of patch for PR59535

2014-02-14 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2/14/2014, 6:02 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 13/02/14 15:10, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 11/02/14 19:43, Vladimir Makarov wrote: This is one more version of the patch to fix the PR59535 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535 Here are the results of applying the patch:

Re: RFA: one more version of patch for PR59535

2014-02-14 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 13/02/14 15:10, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 11/02/14 19:43, Vladimir Makarov wrote: >> This is one more version of the patch to fix the PR59535 >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535 >> >> Here are the results of applying the patch: >> >> Thu

Re: RFA: one more version of patch for PR59535

2014-02-13 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 11/02/14 19:43, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > This is one more version of the patch to fix the PR59535 > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535 > > Here are the results of applying the patch: > > ThumbThumb2 > > reload

RFA: one more version of patch for PR59535

2014-02-11 Thread Vladimir Makarov
This is one more version of the patch to fix the PR59535 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535 Here are the results of applying the patch: ThumbThumb2 reload 2626334 2400154 lra (before the patch)