Re: RFA: fix PR90553, IRA assigning a call-clobbered reg to call with post-increment

2019-05-21 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
> From: Vladimir Makarov > Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 17:05:50 -0400 > Yes, the patch is ok to commit.  Thank you for working on the problem. > > It is hard to reproduce the same problem in LRA as LRA mostly follows > IRA decisions. > > I'll probably do the analogous patch for LRA on this week. T

Re: RFA: fix PR90553, IRA assigning a call-clobbered reg to call with post-increment

2019-05-21 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2019-05-20 9:58 p.m., Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: I was looking into why I couldn't trivially move cris-elf to "use init_array". It appeared that it wasn't the hooks into that machinery that went wrong, but that a compiler bug is plaguing __libc_init_array. It's been there since at least 4.7

RFA: fix PR90553, IRA assigning a call-clobbered reg to call with post-increment

2019-05-20 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
I was looking into why I couldn't trivially move cris-elf to "use init_array". It appeared that it wasn't the hooks into that machinery that went wrong, but that a compiler bug is plaguing __libc_init_array. It's been there since at least 4.7-era, hiding under the covers of the __init_array being