On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Quoting "Joseph S. Myers" :
>
> > On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> >
> > > For this fix I've assumed that it is now the job of the various places
> > > that
> > > do calculations with sizetypes to flag overflows where this is desired.
> >
>
Quoting "Joseph S. Myers" :
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Joern Rennecke wrote:
For this fix I've assumed that it is now the job of the various places that
do calculations with sizetypes to flag overflows where this is desired.
Integer constants may be shared, I don't think setting TREE_OVERFLOW on
ex
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> For this fix I've assumed that it is now the job of the various places that
> do calculations with sizetypes to flag overflows where this is desired.
Integer constants may be shared, I don't think setting TREE_OVERFLOW on
existing constants like you do
For this fix I've assumed that it is now the job of the various places that
do calculations with sizetypes to flag overflows where this is desired.
bootstrapped/regtested on i686-pc-linux-gnu .
2013-07-04 Joern Rennecke
gcc:
PR c/57821
* c/c-typeck.c (set_init_index): When foldi
