Re: RFA: Fix COND_EXEC handling of dead_or_set_regno_p

2012-09-20 Thread Richard Henderson
On 09/19/2012 09:25 PM, Joern Rennecke wrote: > + /* If a COND_EXEC is not executed, the value survives. */ >if (GET_CODE (pattern) == COND_EXEC) > -pattern = COND_EXEC_CODE (pattern); > +return 0; Ok. r~

RFA: Fix COND_EXEC handling of dead_or_set_regno_p

2012-09-19 Thread Joern Rennecke
I've seen a number of execution failures with the soon-to-be submitted ARCompact port in the context of gcc 4.8, which where down to an rtlanal.c:dead_or_set_p problem, e.g.: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c -O1 As the comment at the top of dead_or_set_p states, this function should retur