On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:05:15PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> >> Regardless, the point of this patch is to record which options were
> >> enabled, via
> >> whatever route, in the binaries. This can be useful to users, or
> >> distributors,
> >> who want to check that, for example, a specific s
Hi Jakub,
>> Regardless, the point of this patch is to record which options were enabled,
>> via
>> whatever route, in the binaries. This can be useful to users, or
>> distributors,
>> who want to check that, for example, a specific security option was enabled,
>> or
>> that a particular a pa
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:30:07PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> >>The -frecord-gcc-switches option records the gcc command line. It
> >>does not however expand options like -O2 into the optimizations that
> >>this enables.
>
> >
> > I think individually enabled passe
Hi Richard,
>>The -frecord-gcc-switches option records the gcc command line. It
>>does not however expand options like -O2 into the optimizations that
>>this enables.
>
> I think individually enabled passes by -On are not really useful information
> as you generally cannot replace -
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> The -frecord-gcc-switches option records the gcc command line. It
> does not however expand options like -O2 into the optimizations that
> this enables. Thus if a user wants to know if a specific optimization
> was used
Hi Guys,
The -frecord-gcc-switches option records the gcc command line. It
does not however expand options like -O2 into the optimizations that
this enables. Thus if a user wants to know if a specific optimization
was used when creating an object file, (or library or executable),
they
