Re: RFA: Define vect_perm for variable-length SVE

2018-08-23 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:15 AM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Variable-length SVE now supports enough permutes to define vect_perm. > > The change to vect_perm_supported is currently a no-op because the > function is only called with a count of 3. > > Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu (with and without

RFA: Define vect_perm for variable-length SVE

2018-08-23 Thread Richard Sandiford
Variable-length SVE now supports enough permutes to define vect_perm. The change to vect_perm_supported is currently a no-op because the function is only called with a count of 3. Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu (with and without SVE), aarch64_be-elf and x86_64-linux-gnu. OK for the vect_perm_suppor