On Thu, 2014-10-30 10:46:39 +0400, Denis Chertykov wrote:
> 2014-10-29 13:42 GMT+03:00 Jan-Benedict Glaw :
> > On Wed, 2014-10-29 02:23:31 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2014-10-08 18:50:32 +0100, Joern Rennecke
> > > wrote:
> > > > Attached is the GCC patch for the basic de
2014-10-29 13:42 GMT+03:00 Jan-Benedict Glaw :
>
> On Wed, 2014-10-29 02:23:31 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-10-08 18:50:32 +0100, Joern Rennecke
> > wrote:
> > > Attached is the GCC patch for the basic device package infrastructure.
> > > OK to apply?
> >
> > There's some
On Wed, 2014-10-29 02:23:31 +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 18:50:32 +0100, Joern Rennecke
> wrote:
> > Attached is the GCC patch for the basic device package infrastructure.
> > OK to apply?
>
> There's some fallout on config-list.mk builds:
>
> g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC
On Wed, 2014-10-08 18:50:32 +0100, Joern Rennecke
wrote:
> Attached is the GCC patch for the basic device package infrastructure.
> OK to apply?
There's some fallout on config-list.mk builds:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind
2014-10-08 21:50 GMT+04:00 Joern Rennecke :
> As the steering commitee still hasn't spoken on the maintainership issue,
> apparently this still has to go the write-after-approval route.
>
> The purpose of this patch is to make it possible to add support for new
> devices (MCUs) to the AVR toolchain
As the steering commitee still hasn't spoken on the maintainership issue,
apparently this still has to go the write-after-approval route.
The purpose of this patch is to make it possible to add support for new
devices (MCUs) to the AVR toolchain, without having to re-build the
entire toolchain. T
