Hi Joseph,
C. Draw up another patch that restricts the AVR patterns in config.gcc to
-none and -elf.
A and C - I think both changes should be applied.
OK - the patch for item A is already applied. Here is a proposed patch
for item C. I have not applied the patch as obvious because I was
On Fri, 23 Aug 2013, nick clifton wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
> > Your patch itself makes sense on general principles, but the concept of an
> > AVR Linux target doesn't - this is an 8-bit processor Really, the bug
> > you've found is that there's an avr-*-* case that is too general, matching
> > non
Hi Joseph,
Your patch itself makes sense on general principles, but the concept of an
AVR Linux target doesn't - this is an 8-bit processor Really, the bug
you've found is that there's an avr-*-* case that is too general, matching
nonsensical targets such as AVR Linux rather than just avr-*-
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 10:37 AM
> To: Nick Clifton
> Cc: cherty...@gmail.com; ae...@post.ru; Weddington, Eric; gcc-
> patc...@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: RFA: AVR: Support build
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Hi Dennis, Hi Anatoly, Hi Eric,
>
> I have run into a small problem building GCC for an AVR Linux target -
> glibc-c.o is not being built. It turns out that the section handling
> "avr-*-*" in the config.gcc file is redefining tmake_file without
>
2013/8/12 Nick Clifton :
> Hi Dennis, Hi Anatoly, Hi Eric,
>
> I have run into a small problem building GCC for an AVR Linux target -
> glibc-c.o is not being built. It turns out that the section handling
> "avr-*-*" in the config.gcc file is redefining tmake_file without
> allowing for th
Hi Dennis, Hi Anatoly, Hi Eric,
I have run into a small problem building GCC for an AVR Linux target -
glibc-c.o is not being built. It turns out that the section handling
"avr-*-*" in the config.gcc file is redefining tmake_file without
allowing for the fact that t-glibc has already been
