Got it, will have a try.
Pan
From: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 9:30 AM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: kito.cheng ; gcc-patches ;
Wang, Yanzhang
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Implement RESOLVE_OVERLOADED_BUILTIN for
RVV intrinsic
Add a function call
, Yanzhang
Subject: RE: RE: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Implement RESOLVE_OVERLOADED_BUILTIN for
RVV intrinsic
We cannot leverage this instance for correctness.
The rfun of below code is the overloaded builtin is for the overloaded
function, which is registered as void xxx(void) as aarch64 did to avoid the
From: 钟居哲
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2023 7:20 AM
To: Li, Pan2
Cc: kito.cheng ; gcc-patches ;
Wang, Yanzhang
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Implement RESOLVE_OVERLOADED_BUILTIN for
RVV intrinsic
I don't understand.
+tree
+resolve_overloaded_builtin (location_t loc, unsigned int
-11 23:24
To: 钟居哲
CC: kito.cheng; gcc-patches; Wang, Yanzhang
Subject: RE: RE: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Implement RESOLVE_OVERLOADED_BUILTIN for
RVV intrinsic
For function instance with void or void arguments, it is easy as you mentioned
as below.
For generate API (to get the right hash), you need to bui
: kito.cheng ; gcc-patches ;
Wang, Yanzhang
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Implement RESOLVE_OVERLOADED_BUILTIN for
RVV intrinsic
function_instance
get_read_vl_instance (void)
{
return function_instance ("read_vl", bases::read_vl, shapes::read_vl,
none_ops[0], PRED
mplement RESOLVE_OVERLOADED_BUILTIN for RVV
intrinsic
No. You must construct instance. 'strcmp' is very ugly.
Replied Message
From
Li, Pan2
Date
09/11/2023 20:09
To
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai,
kito.cheng
Cc
gcc-patches,
Wang, Yanzhang
Subject
RE: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Implement RE
are required
by function_instance when constructing.
Pan
From: juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2023 5:13 PM
To: kito.cheng
Cc: Li, Pan2 ; gcc-patches ; Wang,
Yanzhang
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: Implement RESOLVE_OVERLOADED_BUILTIN for
RVV intrinsic
>> Just m
>> Just make sure it's the right change?
It seem incorrect to me.
More comments (I just reviewed again):
+tree
+function_resolver::lookup ()
+{
+ unsigned int code_limit = vec_safe_length (registered_functions);
+
+ for (unsigned code = get_sub_code () + 1; code < code_limit; code++)
+{
+
